Lawyer
Friends,
The Answer given by ‘Gaurav Sharma’ is correct and
the approach (bottom to top) suggested by ‘Shailesh’ is
good. But with minor correction we can arrive the solution
using this approach:
After 5th loot, No. of breads left = 3
after 4th loot, no. of breads left = (3+0.5)x2 = 7
after 3rd loot, no. of breads left = (7+0.5)x2 = 15
after 2nd loot, no. of breads left = (15+0.5)x2 = 31
after 1st loot, no. of breads left = (31+0.5)x2 = 63
So, before 1st loot, no. of breads left = (63+0.5)x2 = 127
Indira Gandhi
sample space=36
prob of one of the dice getting face 6
i.e n={(1,6)(2,6)(3,6)(4,6)(5,6)(6,1)(6,2)(6,3)(6,4)
(6,5)(6,6)}=11
p=n/s
p=11/36
ans:11/36
Reduction of 40% or 4/10th in price of bananas will lead to an increase of 4/(10 – 4) = 2/3rd part in quantity if expenditure is constant.
If original quantity is q, then :
2q/3 = 64
=> q = 64 x 3/2 = 96 = 8 dozens.
=> Original price per dozen = 40/8 = Rs 5
TOTAL NUMBER OF BOOKS 40+40=80
ISSUED BOOKS 30
REMAINING BOOKS 80-30=50
RATE=50/80=5/8
(c) 25%
20*55*65=y*65*75
y=(20*55*65)/(65*75)
y=14.667 =15
y=15
% reduction=(20-15)/20=25%
Complete step-by-step answer:
Investment made by A for 1 year, IA=2000
Investment made by B for 2 year,
IB=2×3000IB=6000
Investment made by C for 2 year,
IC=2×4000IC=8000
The ratio of their investment is given by
IA:IB:IC=2000:6000:8000
To simplify the ratio divide it by 1000,
IA:IB:IC=2:6:8
Now again to simplify divide the ratio by 2,
IA:IB:IC=1:3:4
The total parts of this investment =1+3+4=8
A’s share in the investment is 1 out of the 8 parts; B’s share is 3 out of 8 while C’s share is 4.
Therefore, the profit share of A’s investment of Rs. 2000=18×3200=400.
speed = distence / time
60km/hr=distance / 9 sec
km / hr to m / s==> 60*1000 / 1* 3600 = 16.667
16.667*9 = distance
150 m is the answer
24*4= x(x+4)
solve this
answer is x=8
X+4= 12
Answer: z and u
Explanation:
Y is to the right of U and exactly in front of V. Therefore,
U Y
V
Z is behind W and W and X are at extreme ends. So, W has to be to the right of Y. The final arrangement is as follows.
U Y W
X V Z Therefore, Z and U are at extreme ends is true.
The answer is 42
Servlets are faster as compared to JSP, as they have a short response time.
JSP is slower than Servlets – JSP is a HTML-based codes.
Servlets are harder to code, as here, the HTML codes are written in Java – JSPs are easier to code, as here Java is coded in HTML.
In an MVC architecture, Servlets act as the controllers. – In MVC architectures, the JSPs act as a view to present the output to the users.
The service() function can be overridden in Servlets. – The service() function cannot be overridden in JSPs.
China